Network news, news radio, and the papers want so badly to be taken seriously. Journalists get so offended at the very mention of the word "bias" and they think nobody can do their job but them. Remember last month how somebody in the White House press corps was so offended that Scott McClellan suggested it might be a good idea to have a positive story about the military after Newsweek's story about the Koran was used to start riots in Afghanistan?
MR. McCLELLAN: — because of this report. I think Newsweek is going to be in the best position to determine how to achieve that. And there are ways that I pointed out that they can help repair the damage. One way is to point out what the policies and practices of our United States military are. Our United States military personnel go out of their way to make sure that the Holy Koran is treated with care –
Q Are you asking them to write a story about how great the American military is; is that what you're saying here?
MR. McCLELLAN: Elisabeth, let me finish my sentence. Our military –
Q You've already said what you're — I know what — how it ends.
They took this issue about the Koran so seriously. It was their job to get to the bottom of this story. Blah, blah, blah. These are the same news organizations that saw it fit, last week, to interrupt breaking news about terrorists arrested in California to let us know that nothing was going on at the Michael Jackson trial. I almost threw the remote at the TV when that happened.
I was going to let all of this go, but I was working this morning while listening to KLIF and the most self aggrandizing promo I've ever heard aired during the commercials. Here, listen to this:
Not only is the promo dripping with melodrama, but it tells you they are most proud of their Michael Jackson coverage. To me, it's much more significant that Kofi Annan has been caught lying about his involvement in the Oil for Food scandal. It's certainly more important that there are terrorists being arrested within our own borders. So much time and energy was devoted to the Michael Jackson case when the reality was all that was reported for the week before the verdict was the jury was in deliberation and nothing was known. So much air time was wasted on pundits telling us he was going to be convicted and they were wrong the whole time.
I still can't believe they had the nerve to have a gospel choir singing "Not Guilty" in the background. What the hell?
Here's a good example of journalistic talent wasted: Greta Van Susteren was flown by Fox News out to California to sit around with a gazillion journalists blabbing about how much they don't know. Greta is a very talented legal analyst. A better use of her show would have been analyzing each of the President's judicial nominees. She could have devoted an entire show to each individual. She could have analyzed their rulings and provided viewers with a context to the sound bites that senators kept flinging at the cameras. It's disheartening to see this going on. It's like watching once-wild animals at a bad zoo with too-small cages. Talented analysts are misused, blow-hard pundits are overused, and real news is buried beneath sensationalism.
I'm not even going to go into the annoying back-patting the media did about Deep Throat. You'd think they saved the universe or something. It's sad that journalists try to aspire to something only two of them did thirty years ago.
If the media doesn't pay attention, somebody might just notice their irrelevance.
Popularity: 1% [?]




Unrest by Parkway Drive
Re: The Media Keeps Missing the Point
The media may miss the mark at times, *****, but we still have the best watchdog journalistic industry in the world. I'd rather live with a few quirks than not have them. The reason they don't have Greta doing a show about judicial nominees is that NO ONE would watch it other than a few wonks. It's a sad fact that most people wanted to see minute by minute details of the Michael Jackson trial. You can't just blame the journalists. Unfortunately in today's world the TV stations go by public ratings and the newspapers and newsmagazines have to sell. If news coverage is shallow, it is the public's fault. We still get the important news but now as much detail. Look at Fox News, which is a poor excuse for news, but they cater to their right wing audience by telling them just what they want to hear with onair editorials instead of unbias news.
[Reply]
Re: The Media Keeps Missing the Point
While I understand your point, I don't think we can lay blame with the news consumers. This all started with the big three networks when they decided that news was no longer a public service and started asking the news departments to generate ratings for advertisers. A lot has been written about that. In addition, journalists who covered Vietnam and Watergate changted the rules about objectivity. Again, a lot has been analyzed and written about the shift in journalism after the early 70s.
The reality is that the media likes to blame what they do on the law of supply and demand. However, there is demand for better news, but they insist they are giving people what they want. They also claim bias on both sides of the political spectrum. As you stated above, Fox has a conservative audience. There is bias in all news. Nobody wants to admit it though. Dan Rather was about as biased as they come. So is Aaron Brown on CNN. However, bias is an issue for another article. I'm talking strictly about the serious lack of reporting that goes on these days. True reporting involves research, analysis of that research, and presenting in a way that is useful to the audience. This is why most news organizations take the cheap way out. This is why Fox News would rather show you a car chase than something that actually requires work to investigate and report.
Also, tracking Michael Jackson 24 hours a day is not being watchdogs; it's pandering to sensationalism.
[Reply]